Note the decline in the number of evaluations returned from the first workshop to the last. By the last workshop only about half of those in attendance turned in completed and readable forms.

Evaluation Process

Master copies of evaluation forms were delivered to the Cluster evaluation representative. Copies were distributed to all participants at each Cluster meeting. Participants were asked to answer questions regarding arrangements, technology demonstration sessions, and primary sessions delivered by MIRA trainers.

Forms were returned to the Heartland Center for Leadership Development for processing. Numerical data were scanned and mechanically tabulated using specialized computer software. Written commentary was evaluated thematically, summarized and reported.

MIRA participants were generally eager to assist in the evaluation process. Some teams were interested in sharing a great deal with the evaluator and wanted to convey their investment in their community and in the MIRA process. Other teams were more focused on developing their project and grant application than with discussing the merits of the MIRA process.

Gathering information from the community teams and the Steering Committee was most successful during site visits. It was more difficult to receive responses from phone calls and e-mails.

Evaluation forms from each of the workshop sessions were received on a timely basis for analysis. There was a discrepancy between the level of satisfaction of trainers on the evaluation forms and what was conveyed during personal interviews. Most participants rated the trainers high on the evaluation form, but made comments as to the lack of preparation and skill of the trainers during personal interviews. Comments on the evaluation forms concerning the content of the workshops were consistent with interview responses.